Legal Opinion
Harvey Aluminum v. School District No. 9
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is an appeal by defendant School District No. 9 from a decree of the circuit court of Wasco County purporting to carry out our mandate in Harvey Aluminum v. School District No. 9, 239 Or 571, 399 P2d 149 (1965). The sheriff, assessor and treasurer of Wasco County, who are also defendants, cross-appeal.
The litigation commenced on September 6, 1962, when plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment suit to determine the boundary line between School District No. 9 and School District No. 12. The assessor, treasurer and sheriff were not named as parties in the complaint. On November 15, 1962,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Linn County v. RozelleOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sheppard v. BlitzOregon Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holder v. PettyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Malick v. MalickOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Lebanon v. MilburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- GOSHEN COUNTY CO-OP. BEET ASS'N v. PearsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Goshen County Cooperative Beet Ass'n v. PearsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985