Legal Opinion

Ashraf Elgamal v. Rebecca Bernacke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 5, 2018No. 15-17009, 16-16683UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Plaintiffs sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the Fifth Amendment. The district court dismissed the tort claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. It granted summary judgment on the other claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Senger v. United States, 103 F.3d 1437, 1440 (9th Cir. 1996), and affirm.

I

A. Several of Plaintiffs’ tort claims are about Rebecca Bernacke’s and Cynthia Harper’s alleged conduct. But Plaintiffs did not file an administrative claim until more than two years after they had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Sabow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Mirmehdi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Western Radio Services Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Hensley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seehawer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API