Legal Opinion
Seehawer v. United States
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided August 20, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00018Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO AARON SEEHAWER and VAN CARLSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00018-REP Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND TO DISMISS BORDER PROTECTION, Defendants. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 6). All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 10. Because Plaintiffs have failed to establish that a private party acting like the United States could be held liable under Montana tort law, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.