Legal Opinion

Alaska Public Offices Commission v. Stevens

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2009No. S-13016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) imposed a civil penalty against Alaska State Senator Ben Stevens for failing to report certain income on his 2006 Legislative Financial Disclosure Statement (LFD) for calendar year 2005. Stevens appealed to the superior court, which reversed APOC’s decision. APOC now appeals the superior court’s decision. Because APOC’s reporting requirements were ambiguous and must be strictly construed in favor of Stevens, we affirm the superior court’s decision that APOC may not impose a civil penalty against Stevens.

II.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Higginson v. WestergardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Gottschalk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. State, Department of Environmental ConservationAlaska Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Municipality of Anchorage v. AdamsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bradshaw v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State, Department of Corrections v. Hendricks-PearceAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Austin Ahmasuk v. Division of Banking and SecuritiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. RBG Bush Planes, LLC v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API