Legal Opinion

Crandall v. Bacon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1866PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from tbe Circuit -Court for Sauk County. This was an appeal by tbe defendants Ira P. and Lyman Bacon, from a judgment of said circuit court, perpetually restraining (for fraud in obtaining it) tbe collection of a judgment rendered by a justice of tbe peace of said county, in favor of Ira P. Bacon against Orandall, which judgment bad been assigned to Lyman Bacon.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from tbe Circuit -Court for Sauk County. This was an appeal by tbe defendants Ira P. and Lyman Bacon, from a judgment of said circuit court, perpetually restraining (for fraud in obtaining it) tbe collection of a judgment rendered by a justice of tbe peace of said county, in favor of Ira P. Bacon against Orandall, which judgment bad been assigned to Lyman Bacon. Ira P. Bacon answered, among other things, that he had no'interest legal or equitable in the judgment at the commencement of the suit, and insisted that the plaintiff’s only remedy was by certiorari. Lyman Bacon answered…

1Opinion of the CourtDowner, J.

The judgment of the justice of the peace enjoined by the circuit court was void. The justice adjourned the cause one week, without specifying the hour of the day, or tho> place to which it was adjourned. He thereby lost jurisdiction of the cause. Roberts v. Warren, 3 Wis., 736; Brown v. Kellogg, 17 Wis., 475.

There was a plain, adequate remedy by common law certi-orari to reverse this void judgment.

By the Court.- — -The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

A motion for a rehearing was denied.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WarrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Brown v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ford v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Grace v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Brown v. GobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. San Juan & St. Louis Mining & Smelting Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API