Legal Opinion

Jarrell v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2006No. 06A05-0506-CR-356PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

James Jarrell appeals his conviction for operating a motor vehicle with a breath alcohol concentration of at least .15 gram per 210 liters of breath (operating with .15 BAC), a Class A misdemeanor. We affirm.

Issues

The issues before us are:

I. whether Jarrell's rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated by introduction into evidence of the certificate attesting that the machine used to test his breath for aleohol had been inspected and was

II. whether there is sufficient evidence to support his conviction.

Facts

The underlying…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. KirkpatrickWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Dannie Carl Pattison v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API