Legal Opinion

People v. Henson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1997No. E018074PublishedCited by 9 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Defendant was convicted of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 stalking (§ 646.9, subd. (a)), and peeking while loitering. (§ 647, subds. (h), (i).) Because defendant had prior serious and violent felony convictions, the court sentenced him to a term of 25 years to life for each current offense, pursuant to the three strikes law. (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12.)

In the published part of this opinion, we conclude the court improperly limited defendant’s presentence conduct credits to 15 percent of time served, under section 2933.1. That statute applies only where the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. HendrixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. PhilpotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. People v. Van BurenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API