Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

California Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1999No. S075090PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

We consider in this case whether a defendant sentenced under the three strikes law (Pen. Code, 1 § 1170.12) is entitled to presentence conduct credits, and if so, whether he is entitled to such credits under section 4019 or to a lesser maximum amount under section 2933.1. We conclude a defendant is so entitled, and that the presentence conduct credits in this case are calculated under section 4019. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant Otis Michael Thomas was found guilty of first degree residential burglary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. RayfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re LittlefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. MontesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. PhilpotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API