Legal Opinion

Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Whitley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 19, 1997No. 3-94-0830PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdridge

Benjamin Franklin is credited with the saying that in this world nothing is certain but death and taxes. However, we are convinced that he never had to consider the following: are royalties and interest paid to a domestic parent company by a foreign subsidiary under the domestic "water’s-edge” combined reporting method of apportioning income to be treated the same as dividends paid between similar entities under the "single-entity” apportionment method. We have.

After a careful review of the record and the relevant case law, and considering Dr. Franklin’s advice that "haste makes waste,” we…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. NCR Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. General Telephone Co. v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People Ex Rel. Partee v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Emerson Electric Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. ChiCorp, Inc. v. BowerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Fujitsu IT Holdings, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Emerson Elec. Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API