Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Partee v. Murphy

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1990No. 68846PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

The State’s Attorney seeks a supervisory order against Judge Michael J. Murphy of the circuit court of Cook County, directing him to find that there is no conflict of interest for the State’s Attorney to represent the county treasurer and the county clerk in their official capacities in a tax indemnity proceeding. For the reasons stated below, we find that resolution of the issue would constitute an advisory opinion and, therefore, we remand the matter for further proceedings in the circuit court of Cook County.

Section 247a of the Revenue Act of 1939 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 120, par. 728a)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wallace v. LabrenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Underground Contractors Ass'n v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  4. The People v. RedlichIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Steinbrecher v. SteinbrecherIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. Austin M.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People Ex Rel. Birkett v. BakalisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2025

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API