United States v. Ledezma
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Chief Judge:
Tried by special court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of stealing stereo equipment, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months and reduction to sergeant.
In a single assignment of error appellate defense counsel assert:
THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WAS NOT ADVISED OF THE LIMITED ACCEPTABLE PURPOSE FOR THE REVIEW’S USE OF UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT PRESENTED AT TRIAL.
During the presentencing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. WorleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. BlauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. PlanteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. SpenceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. BreuerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. ParmarU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. WyrozynskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. ManselU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. PawlyschynU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980