Legal Opinion

United States v. Ledezma

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 13, 1978No. ACM S24557PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

EARLY, Chief Judge:

Tried by special court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of stealing stereo equipment, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months and reduction to sergeant.

In a single assignment of error appellate defense counsel assert:

THE CONVENING AUTHORITY WAS NOT ADVISED OF THE LIMITED ACCEPTABLE PURPOSE FOR THE REVIEW’S USE OF UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT PRESENTED AT TRIAL.

During the presentencing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WorleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. BlauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. PlanteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. HamiltonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. SpenceU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. BreuerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. ParmarU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. WyrozynskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. ManselU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. PawlyschynU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API