Legal Opinion

United States v. Wyrozynski

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 25, 1979No. ACM S24705PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HERMAN, Judge:

The questions presented for resolution are whether the military judge erred in failing, sua sponte, to instruct the members of the court to disregard what is termed uncharged misconduct, in addition to hearsay evidence of the accused’s poor job performance given by his unit commander.

The accused was convicted, in accordance with his pleas, by a special court-martial which included members, of a failure to go, two assaults consummated by batteries, an unlawful entry and a breach of restriction, in violation of Articles 86, 128, and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BlauUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. Bayard v. United States Ex Rel. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Wyche v. United States. Thorpe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. United States v. PlanteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. Merkle C. Altom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. GudelU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. BoughtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. ArmstrongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API