Legal Opinion
Lamar Advertising of Michigan, Inc. v. City of Utica
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 2, 2011No. Case 09-14218Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DENISE PAGE HOOD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Utica’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 9, filed on May 18, 2010], On June 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 14], to which Defendant filed a Reply [Docket No. 15, filed on June 14, 2010].
This matter is also before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on May 24, 2010 [Docket No. 11].…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.