Legal Opinion

Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. v. City of Kingsport

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

We granted certiorari in this case because it involved the power of municipalities to enact ordinances for the abatement of smoke and dust issuing from manufacturing plants to the injury of the health of the people. Counsel for the plaintiff in error and the defendant have discussed the case at length both in oral argument and by filing elaborate briefs.

While several assignments of error have been filed with the record the real question - for our decision is whether or not Ordinance No. 970 of the City of Kings-*453port is authorized by its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yards Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Spencer-Sturla Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Buffalo v. . StevensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Fifth Ave. Coach Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Venner v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Variance BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Ellwest Stereo Theater, Inc. v. BonerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
  3. State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. State of Colorado Department of Health Air Pollution Variance BoardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  5. City of Miami v. City of Coral GablesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API