Legal Opinion
State v. Turnbull
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 2009No. A08-0532PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORKE, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of ineligible person in possession of a firearm, arguing that (1) Minn.Stat. § 624.713 (2006) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and (2) he cannot be deprived of his right to bear arms without a jury trial. We affirm.
FACTS
In 2004, appellant Ryan Turnbull was adjudicated delinquent on dangerous-weapons charges, criminal damage to property, and felony drive-by shooting. In 2006, a conservation officer observed appellant carrying a firearm during hunting season. Appellant was charged and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Presser v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RunyanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009