Legal Opinion

Matter of the Application of Linus E. Russell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 30, 1956No. Patent Appeals 6227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of the single claim of appellant’s . application for a patent on a design for a pump, on the ground of lack of invention over appellant’s prior patent, Des. 170,387. The appealed claim is as follows:

North . 385,319

Tucker D-107,465

Peters et al. 2,557,139

Russell D-170,387

Appellant’s application discloses a pump comprising a cylindrical body having generally circular and closure plates, each of which is provided, at spaced points around its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Application of ColemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. In re WardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. In Re BargeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  5. Application of CampbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Implement Mfg. Co., Inc. And George Partin v. Price C. McLemoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Adidas Fabrique De Chaussures De Sport v. Andmore Sportswear Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. McLemore v. Southern Implement Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API