Legal Opinion

State v. Brossart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1997No. Criminal 960331PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Rodney Brossart appealed a jury conviction for plowing a section line. We reverse and remand for a new trial because the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury.

[¶2] Brossart farms land in sections 30 and 31 of Williams Township. He has regularly plowed across the unimproved section line between these sections, he says tó control weeds and to make it more passable for travel. His father, too, had done so for many years.

[¶ 3] In spring 1996, someone complained to the Williams Township Board of Supervisors that the section lines between sections 30 and 31 in that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Heck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HogieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. Eagle HawkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. McIntyreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. North Dakota Securities Commissioner v. Juran & Moody, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. HafnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. LusbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kukowski v. WagnerUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API