Legal Opinion

State v. Eagle Hawk

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1987No. 15361, 15362PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION/ISSUES

For purposes of clarity and convenience, we shall refer to defendants-appellants Mary Ann Spirit Track and Burton Eagle Hawk as appellants or parents. Both were found guilty of Abuse of or Cruelty to a Minor concerning their three children, Lionel, Malinda, and Burton Spirit Track. They contend the convictions should be reversed and separately raise three common issues in their appeals:(1) Both appellants were entitled to judgments of acquittal;(2) SDCL 26-10-1 is vague and indefinite; and(3) trial court improperly instructed the jury and refused legitimate…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. Bad Heart BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. KleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API