State v. Eagle Hawk
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION/ISSUES
For purposes of clarity and convenience, we shall refer to defendants-appellants Mary Ann Spirit Track and Burton Eagle Hawk as appellants or parents. Both were found guilty of Abuse of or Cruelty to a Minor concerning their three children, Lionel, Malinda, and Burton Spirit Track. They contend the convictions should be reversed and separately raise three common issues in their appeals:(1) Both appellants were entitled to judgments of acquittal;(2) SDCL 26-10-1 is vague and indefinite; and(3) trial court improperly instructed the jury and refused legitimate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WilliquetteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. Bad Heart BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DaviSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KleinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.