Legal Opinion

Maines v. Hill

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 14, 2002No. 01-2636 D/A (M1)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING M.S. CARRIERS, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is M.S. Carriers Inc.’s (“Carriers”) Motion for Summary Judgment, which was filed on December 20, 2001. 1 Based on the following discussion, the Court hereby GRANTS Carriers’ motion.

1. Background

This case arises from an automobile accident which occurred on August 12, 2000, in Shelby County, Tennessee. (M.S. Carriers, Inc.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, ¶ 4; Pl.’s Resp. to Def. M.S. Carriers’ Statement of Facts, ¶ 4; Compl., ¶ 7.) 2 Plaintiffs Maines and McElvain assert that they were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Douglas Emmons v. Robert McLaughlin Donald Ratliff, Gary Dewalt, City of Norwalk, Reese WinemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Refiners Transport & Terminal Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis Michael Harris v. Mickey Deanne HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Dennis Michael Harris, et ux v. Mickey Deanne HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API