Legal Opinion

Moxness v. City of Newport

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 1988No. 84-0333; CA A37936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The city of Newport (city) seeks indemnity from state for liability which it incurred when a state road sign fell and injured plaintiff. At issue is whether city was acting as state’s agent when it re-erected the sign shortly before the accident. We affirm the summary judgment requiring state to indemnify city.

The sign, which marked the entrance to a parking lot for the Motor Vehicles Division and State Police offices in Newport, fell and struck plaintiff while she was jogging on the roadway near the sign. She filed complaints alleging claims against city and state. Both defendants filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cain v. RijkenOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Peeples v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Samuel v. FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Samuel v. FrohnmayerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKinley v. Owyhee Project North Board of ControlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Giese v. Bay Area Health DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Bridge v. CarverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Welker Ex Rel. Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. McKinley v. OWYHEE PROJECT N. BD. OF CONTROLCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API