Legal Opinion
Earle v. Enos
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided May 13, 1904No. 59PublishedCited by 5 opinions
At Law. On motion for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The affidavit of defense in this case is as follows:
“David G. Enos, being duly sworn according to law, deposeth and saith that he is the defendant in the above-entitled case, and as such has a just, true, *468full, and complete defense to the plaintiff’s entire claim as contained in said statement, of the following nature, to wit:
“(1) The deponent admits that he signed the note upon which suit in this case was brought.
“(2) The deponent avers that at the time of the execution and delivery of the said note to the Chestnut Street National Bank, William M. Singerly was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Brown v. SpoffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Forsythe v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Specht v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Phillips v. MeilySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bromfield v. Trinidad Nat. Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Paradis & Sons, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Drake v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1936
- Long v. ShaferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
- Williams v. HochsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914