Legal Opinion

Drake v. Moore

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided April 3, 1936No. 532-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, as receiver of the First National Bank of Monticello, sues defendant upon a defaulted promissory note for $3,000 and interest. Defendant contends that there was no consideration for the instrument.

In March, 1932, the president of the bank announced to defendant’s father that the. institution’s capital had been reduced in such an amount as to make an existing loan to the father of $20,000 excessive in the sum of $2,000. The president testified that he said to the father that he must either pay $2,000 upon the latter’s indebtedness or secure its reduction by…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Fourth Street Bank of Philadelphia v. YardleySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Honolulu Savings & Loan Co. v. ReedHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API