Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Exxonmobil Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2013No. 12-1103PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY concurred.

Judge DUNCAN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.

TRAXLER, Chief Judge:

ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and John R. Hicks (together, “Defendants”) appeal a district court order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the Colorado River doctrine in a case brought against Defendants. See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

In June 2004, hundreds of residents of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bartels Ex Rel. Bartels v. Saber Healthcare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  3. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. MilasinovichDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  4. Ernest Fenton v. Kelli DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Marcus Huey v. Equitable Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API