Ackerman v. Exxonmobil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Chief Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY concurred.
Judge DUNCAN wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.
TRAXLER, Chief Judge:
ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon”) and John R. Hicks (together, “Defendants”) appeal a district court order abstaining from exercising jurisdiction under the Colorado River doctrine in a case brought against Defendants. See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L.Ed.2d 483 (1976). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
I
In June 2004, hundreds of residents of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bartels Ex Rel. Bartels v. Saber Healthcare Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Tucker v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. MilasinovichDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Ernest Fenton v. Kelli DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Marcus Huey v. Equitable Production CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.