Legal Opinion

Ernest Fenton v. Kelli Dudley

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 2014No. 14-1067PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the conditions under which a defendant may remove a case to federal court pursuant to the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443. We conclude that § 1443 was not satisfied in this case, and therefore affirm the district court’s remand order.

I. Background

In 2010, Tonya Davis retained Ernest Fenton to represent her in connection with a home foreclosure proceeding. Davis later sued Fenton for malpractice. Davis claimed that, although she paid Fenton several thousand dollars for legal assistance, he did virtually nothing to help her keep her home.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Georgia v. RachelSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Johnson v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tonya Davis v. Ernest FentonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. BIOCONVERGENCE LLC v. ATTARIWALADistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
  3. CARRUTH v. STATE OF GEORGIADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2025
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. StrasburgDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
  5. Continuum Capital Funding LLC v. Jerome HardwickDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API