Legal Opinion

Beclar Corp. v. Young

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1988No. CIVIL NO. 85-1566; CIVIL NO. 85-3437; NO. 11834PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

Beclar Corporation (Beclar), a Hawaii corporation, the plaintiff-counterclaim defendant in Civil No. 85-1566, appeals from a directed verdict against it which was based upon the trial court’s ruling that Beclar had violated an option agreement (option) between Kevin Pillard (Pillard), the third-party defendant in Civil No. 85-1566 and the defendant in Civil No. 85-3437, 1 and Richard Young (Richard) and Harriet Young (Harriet) (collectively the Youngs), who are the defendants-counter-claimants and third-party plaintiffs in Civil No. 85-1566 and the plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Burgess v. AritaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Leeward Bus Co., Ltd. v. CITY & CTY. OF HONOLULUHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hung Wo Ching v. Hawaiian Restaurants, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. FRANKLIN v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Weinberg v. MauchHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Koolau Radiology, Inc. v. Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API