Beclar Corp. v. Young
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
HEEN, J.
Beclar Corporation (Beclar), a Hawaii corporation, the plaintiff-counterclaim defendant in Civil No. 85-1566, appeals from a directed verdict against it which was based upon the trial court’s ruling that Beclar had violated an option agreement (option) between Kevin Pillard (Pillard), the third-party defendant in Civil No. 85-1566 and the defendant in Civil No. 85-3437, 1 and Richard Young (Richard) and Harriet Young (Harriet) (collectively the Youngs), who are the defendants-counter-claimants and third-party plaintiffs in Civil No. 85-1566 and the plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ai v. Frank Huff Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Shoemaker v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Burgess v. AritaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- Leeward Bus Co., Ltd. v. CITY & CTY. OF HONOLULUHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Hung Wo Ching v. Hawaiian Restaurants, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- STATE EX REL. FRANKLIN v. McBrideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Hawaii Medical Ass'n v. Hawaii Medical Service Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Brown v. KFC National Management Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Weinberg v. MauchHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Koolau Radiology, Inc. v. Queen's Medical CenterHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.