Legal Opinion

The Eliza Lines

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided April 20, 1900No. 368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Admiralty. This was a consolidated suit arising out of the abandonment at sea, after a storm, of the Norwegian bark Eliza Lines, and the subsequent bringing of such vessel, with her cargo, into the port of Boston, as a derelict, by the original libelants.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The question before the court is that of confirming the report of the commissioner appointed in accord-*185anee with the opinion passed down on April 3, 1891. (O. 0.) 61 Fed. 308. The commissioner has, in the main, pursued the course marked out in that opinion, and his report is of the utmost value to the court in disposing of the case. jSTo exceptions have been filed except by James E. Ward & Co. Near the close of our prior opin ion, we directed that all things decreed by the district court should be followed except as otherwise provided for or modified by us. This had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andreasen v. Two Hundred & Ninety-Five Thousand Feet of LumberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1894
  2. The Nathaniel HooperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1839
  3. Nashua Iron & Steel Co. v. BrushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898
  4. Jordan v. Warren Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Eliza LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Boonville National Bank v. BlakeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. The Eliza LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1902
  4. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp. v. Pasfield Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API