The Eliza Lines
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
199 U.S. 119
26 S.Ct. 8
50 L.Ed. 115
THE ELIZA LINES.
No. 12.
Argued April 11, 12, 13, 1905.
Decided October 30, 1905.
Messrs. L. S. Dabney and F. Cunningham for Booth.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 120-122 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Edward S. Dodge, Harrington Putnam, and Frederic Dodge for Black, administratrix, and Banque De Genes.
Messrs. James A. Lowell and John Lowell for Hans Andreasen, claimant, etc.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 122-125 intentionally omitted]
2Opinion of the Court · HolmesJustice Holmes
1
This case comes here by certiorari to the circuit court of appeals. The decree in that court was made in a cause in which were…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Mason v. Ship BlaireauSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Gillis v. CobeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Ballou v. BillingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- The Turret CrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Hichino Uyeno v. AchesonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1951
- In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings Empanelled May 1988. Appeal of Dennis FrelighCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wefel v. StillmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- T. J. Stevenson & Co. v. 81,193 Bags of FlourCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.