Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Grandolsky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 26, 2009No. 09-1742PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Albert Gardner appeals pro se from an order by the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. For the following reasons, we will affirm the District Court’s decision.
I
In 2006, Gardner pleaded guilty to one charge of possession with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota sentenced him to a 30 month term of imprisonment for that charge, a 27 month term of imprisonment for violating a previously-imposed term of supervised release, and a three…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Vega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Arrington v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by33 opinions
- Joseph Egan v. Delaware River Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Louisiana Forestry Ass'n Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Billy ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Comite' De Apoyo a Los Trabajadores Agricolas v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Licon v. LedezmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.