Legal Opinion
United States v. Billy Reynolds
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 14, 2013No. 08-4747PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This case returns to us after the Supreme Court’s review in Reynolds v. United States, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 975, 181 L.Ed.2d 935 (2012). Remand requires that we reach the merits of Reynolds’s claim that the regulatory rule upon which his indictment was based was promulgated in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). This claim gives rise to three questions: (1) What is the appropriate standard of review of an agency’s assertion of good cause in waiving the APA’s notice and comment requirements? (2) Did the Attorney General have good cause to waive…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State of California v. the Little Sisters of the PoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. President United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Robert FranzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. WhitlowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Mid Continent Nail Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.