Legal Opinion

Frith v. John Deere Co.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 11, 1996No. Civil Action 3:93-0862PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Ruling and Order

MELANQON, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed jointly by the defendants, The John Deere Company, Deere & Company (Deere), and Nippendenso America, Inc. (Nippendenso). Also before the Court is Defendant Nippendenso America, Inc.’s separate Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ joint motion is granted; Nippendenso America, Inc.’s separate motion is denied as moot.

Factual Background,

Plaintiffs, Billy J. Frith and Louise Frith, brought this action against Deere & Co. 1 and Nippendenso America, Inc. under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gilboy v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  5. Delphen v. Dept. of Transp. & Dev.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Weasler Engineering Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Broussard v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2006
  3. Green v. BDI PHARMACEUTICALSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Ellis v. Weasler EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  5. Loyton Courville, Et Ux. v. Ford Motor CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API