Legal Opinion
Broussard v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided November 22, 2006No. Civil Action 05-0528PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
MELANgON, Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [Ree. Doc. 19] filed by defendants, Procter & Gamble Company, Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, and Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (collectively, “defendant” or “Procter & Gamble”); and a Motion in Opposition to defendant’s Motion [Rec. Doc. 21] filed by plaintiffs, Francis Jude Broussard and Rachel Gremillion Brous-sard. In their Opposition, plaintiffs make a conditional request for additional time to conduct discovery. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jones v. Coty Inc.United States Circuit Court · 2018
- VITATOE v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2010
- Banks v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Blondzetta Hay Neal v. Smith & Nephew IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Brandon Thompson v. SharkNinja Operating L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.