Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Company v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 23, 1963No. 40022PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
The parties, who appear here in the same relative position as in the trial court, will be referred to herein as they appeared in said court.
In so far as material, plaintiff alleged in its petition that in September, 1956, it executed, as surety, a performance and maintenance bond in which Color Rite Concrete Company, a corporation, hereafter 'referred to as “Color Rite”, was principal and Bartlesville Land and Development Co., hereafter referred to as “Land Co.”, and the City of Bartlesville were obligees; that by the terms of the bond Color Rite and plaintiff “agreed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- McMahan v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Davis v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Fourth National Bank of Tulsa v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Grubbs v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- James Energy Co. v. HCG Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa v. ABC Construction Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.