Legal Opinion
Brunner v. Hutchinson Division, Lear-Siegler, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 15, 1991No. Civ. 89-5065PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTEY, District Judge.
This case arises from an injury to plaintiffs ward, Jeremiah Brunner, age 2V2 at the time of the injury, which occurred on the Brunner family farm near Vale, South Dakota. The injury was the result of contact between the infant Brunner and machinery manufactured by defendant and third-party plaintiff Hutchinson Division, Lear-Siegler, Inc. (Lear-Siegler). LearSiegler subsequently filed a third-party complaint seeking indemnity and/or contribution from third-party defendants Brad Brunner and H.L. Brunner & Sons.
Third-party defendants have made…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hartman Ex Rel. Hartman v. HartmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Barnes v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Zellmer v. ZellmerWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Pavlick v. PavlickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997