Legal Opinion

City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control Board

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2005No. S119248, B151175, B152562PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Federal law establishes national water quality standards but allows the states to enforce their own water quality laws so long as they comply with federal standards. Operating within this federal-state framework, California’s nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards establish water quality policy. They also issue permits for the discharge of treated waste-water; these permits specify the maximum allowable concentration of chemical pollutants in the discharged wastewater.

The question here is this: When a regional board issues a permit to a wastewater treatment facility,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. California Ex Rel. State Water Resources Control BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Arkansas v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County v. Washington Department of EcologySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cal. Building Industry Assn. v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Supreme Court · 2018
  5. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API