Legal Opinion

Plaisted v. Tangen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1967No. 39359PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

The plaintiff (appellant) appeals from a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the defendants (respondents).

The plaintiff, John L. Plaisted, alleges in his complaint that he sustained injuries, by reason of the defendants’ negligence, when he slipped on a loose sheet of plywood while attempting to enter a building being constructed by the defendants, Herbert Tangen and Bertil Lundh, copartners.

The plaintiff is a painter and has long worked at his trade in the Seattle area. He was employed at various times by Tangen to do the painting on residence construction jobs contracted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mills v. Orcas Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Straight v. B. F. Goodrich Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Dotson v. HaddockWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McKinnon v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Felsman v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Chase v. Daily Record, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Ruffer v. St. Frances Cabrini HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  4. Blenheim v. Dawson & Hall, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. S. L. Rowland Construction Co. v. Beall PipeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API