Legal Opinion

George v. Town of Watertown

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 19, 2004No. AC 24867PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, Duane George, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his three count complaint against the defendants, the town of Watertown (town) and the town planning and zoning commission (commission). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and argues that (1) his first two claims satisfy one or both of the exceptions to the rule against collateral attacks on zoning rulings and (2) his third claim is ripe for judicial consideration. We affirm in part and reverse in part…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. Sigal v. WiseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Gay & Lesbian Law Students Ass'n v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Upjohn Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bloom v. MiklovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. Miskimen v. BiberConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Caltabiano v. L & L Real Estate Holdings II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Bingham v. Department of Public WorksConnecticut Superior Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API