Legal Opinion

Plaine v. McCabe

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 27, 1986No. 83-6552PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Carol Plaine, a former shareholder of Magma Power Company (“Magma”), brought suit against Natomas Company (“Natomas”), Magma, and various individual officers of both companies alleging violations of section 14(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 78n(e) (1982) (“the Act”), and state securities laws in connection with Natomas’ tender offer to, and eventual merger with, Magma. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants, ruling that a decision of the California Corporations Commissioner (“Commissioner”) that…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Ledesma v. Jack Stewart Produce, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. El Tropicano, Inc. v. Garza (In Re El Tropicano, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1991
  4. McCaw Personal Communications, Inc. v. Pacific Telesis GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1986
  5. Vietnamese Fishermen Ass'n of America v. California Department of Fish & GameDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API