Legal Opinion
Plonley v. Reser
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided March 3, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 9898PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiffs owned and occupied as their home the property which adjoined a vacant lot on which appellant as a contractor conducted grading operations. These included dumping loose dirt from a height of 50 or 60 feet. The dust raised by appellant in these operations damaged *Supp. 937plaintiffs’ real and personal property, for which the court awarded plaintiffs a judgment of $1,500.
Appellant contends (1) the denial of his motion for judgment on the pleadings was error, and (2) the damages awarded plaintiffs were improper because they were based on receipts signed by third parties…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Malinson v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- McIvor v. Mercer-Fraser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Mai v. HKT Cal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021