State ex rel. Martin v. Ryan
Nebraska Supreme Court
Original application in quo loarranto to oust respondents from the office of fire and police commissioners of South Omaha.
1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.
This is an original proceeding in quo loarranto against the respondents, John J. Ryan and Joseph Pivonka, fire and police commissioners of the city of South Omaha. Nebraska, brought under the provisions of “An act to provide for the removal by quo warranto of derelict officers,” commonly known, as the “Sackett law.” Laws 1907, ch. 87; Comp. St. 1911, ch. 71, secs, 1a, 1b.
The information sets out at length that there are three members of the board of fire and police commissioners, two of whom are tiie respondents and the other is the *638mayor of the city. It sets forth specifically the statutory…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cleland v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Graham v. TibbetsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Hale v. McGettiganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. Casper v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Common Council v. SchmidMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- State ex rel. Timothy v. HowseTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Bevin v. Commonwealth ex rel. BeshearMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- State ex rel. Davis v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.