Legal Opinion
Garpeg, Ltd. v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1984No. 83 Civ. 6885 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
As more fully set forth in the opinion of this date in Vanguard International Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States, 588 F.Supp 1229 (RWS), this action is one of a series of related actions arising out of an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) investigation of Dr. Aldo Gucci (“Gucci”) and Gucci Shops, Inc. (“Gucci Shops"). On August 22, 1983, the IRS issued an administrative summons to Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”), a third-party recordkeeper, pursuant to sections 7602 and 7609 of the Internal Reve nue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. §§ 7602, 7609. The summons requested…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Grant Foster and Foster Construction C.A., Intervenors-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States of America and Ralph L. Guyette, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. John B. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Albert ShlomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Vanguard International Manufacturing, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Garpeg, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984