Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2004No. A03-1341PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Law-enforcement officers received a tip from a confidential, reliable informant (CRI) stating that a man named “O” would be arriving at a particular address in Apple Valley with crack cocaine. After the officers set up surveillance, the CRI called and stated that 0 would be driving a rental car and described 0⅛ clothing in detail. Respondent, Orlando Ross, arrived at the appointed time, and the officers detained and searched him, finding crack cocaine. The district court found that there were insufficient indicia of the CRI’s reliability to conclude that there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald LuhmCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. State v. EdstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State of Minnesota v. Gabino Otero LabraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API