Legal Opinion

VanHaverbeke v. Bernhard

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 3, 1986No. C-3-85-577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION CONDITIONALLY OVERRULING DEFENDANT KELLY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART AND SUSTAINING SAME IN PART (DOC. #19); PLAINTIFF ORDERED TO FILE AFFIDAVIT AUTHENTICATING AND SUPPORTING EXH. A TO DOC. # 20 WITHIN TEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS OPINION

RICE, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on Defendant Christopher Kelley’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. # 19). For the reasons set forth below, said Motion is conditionally overruled in part and sustained in part (with respect to the theory of substantial encouragement). Provided the Plaintiff complies with the conditions set…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SaulsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API