Hogg v. Maxwell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
On rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
We heretofore reversed the judgment in this case in favor of the defendant on the ground that the stipulation made at the trial did not establish jurisdiction because of citizenship of the parties. 215 Fed. 360, 131 C. C. A. 502. Subsequently both sides agreed that it was the intention of the stipulation to state that the plaintiff was a citizen as well as a resident of New Jersey and the defendants citizens of New York, as alleged in the complaint. Accordingly we now proceed to examine the case further and to express the opinion of the majority of the court. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- George v. TateSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hartshorn v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1857
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitcomb v. ShultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. KittlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Keatley v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Pringle v. StorrowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
- Massachusetts Protective Ass'n v. KittlesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.