Legal Opinion
Burlington Grocery Co. v. Lines
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
This is an action of contract in the form of general assumpsit to recover the purchase price of 3 Ó bags of Java sugar, sold to the defendants, doing business as a partnership. The answer was a general denial. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendants’ exceptions.
*407On May 22, 1920, Harry Lines, acting for the firm, signed a memorandum of the bargain for the sugar, which was admitted in evidence over the defendants’ objection and exception. The only question made as to its sufficiency pertains to the statement therein of the price of the goods. That…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Turner v. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Barron v. International Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Hunt v. LewisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Blaisdell & Barron v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1900
- Smith v. StantonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mantell v. International Plastic Harmonica Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
- Schloss v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.