Legal Opinion

Laur & Mack Contracting v. DiCienzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiff’s motion and cross motion for an order compelling arbitration and properly granted defendant’s motion to stay arbitration. Plaintiff was hired as the general contractor for the construction of a hotel in Niagara Falls, New York, and commenced this action to recover the final payment allegedly due on that contract. Defendant, the owner of the project, counterclaimed, alleging that plaintiff did not perform certain work in accordance with the contract and specifications. By commencing this action,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Empire Insurance v. Food City, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Timms v. GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Mathews v. Fluor Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sovik v. Healing NetworkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Tomaselli v. MalageseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API