Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Fluor Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1994No. 24014PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellants, Bankers Trust of South Carolina (Bankers Trust) and Fluor Corporation (Fluor), appeal from the denial of their motions for summary judgment to stay proceedings, and to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-14. We affirm.

In 1982, Daniel International Corporation distributed the Daniel Building, located in Greenville, South Carolina, to Fluor as a dividend. In July 1982, Fluor desired to transfer the Daniel Building to its Employees Trust Fund (Trust Fund) as a corporate contribution. Not being licensed to do business in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Timms v. GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Munoz v. Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Towles v. United Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Cecala v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Thornton v. Trident Medical Center, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Soil Remediation Co. v. Nu-Way Environmental, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API