Legal Opinion

Noe v. McDevitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

Judge Burney predicated his judgment denying plaintiff injunctive relief and dismissing his action on a holding that under the evidence the territory named in the contract — North Carolina and South Carolina — was too extensive to come within the reasonable requirement of plaintiff’s protection, supposing him to be entitled to such relief anywhere upon the facts found, and was an unreasonable restraint on employment. ¥e concur in this conclusion. Giving the plaintiff the benefit of very generous inferences, while he may have shown the conduct of a business to some extent in eastern North…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Moskin Bros. Inc. v. SwartzbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Comfort Spring Corp. v. . BurroughsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Beverage Systems of the Carolinas, LLC v. Associated Beverage Repair, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc. v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Welcome Wagon International, Inc. v. PenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. HENLEY PAPER COMPANY v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API