Legal Opinion

State v. Dunham

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 31, 2020No. 121081PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,081 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JEREMY MICHAEL DUNHAM, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Even when the language of a statute is clear, an ambiguity can arise when the language conflicts with other statutes. In these situations, text alone is only the beginning. Context is necessary to give a more precise meaning. 2. When faced with statutes that appear to conflict, it is the duty of the court, as far as practicable, to reconcile the different provisions so as to make them consistent, harmonious, and sensible. 3. When multiple…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. GumforySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. SilverbrandCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. CarvinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. CorbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. HameenCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  5. State v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API