State ex rel. Atchison v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
This action to compel the attorney-general, to pay over to the state treasurer a certain fee presents one question: Can that officer, for services during the present term, retain, in addition to his salary, a fee adj udged and paid to him in a contempt proceeding under the prohibitory law ?
Section 6 of chapter 488 of the Laws of 1905 (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 9007), like section 6 of chapter 181 of the Laws of 1891; fixed the salary at $2500. Section 16 of chapter 181 required all fees received by any of the salaried officers mentioned in the act to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nation v. TulleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- City of Wichita v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
- Reilly v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Cashin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Heinz v. LarimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.