Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Atchison v. Dawson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1913No. 18,838PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

This action to compel the attorney-general, to pay over to the state treasurer a certain fee presents one question: Can that officer, for services during the present term, retain, in addition to his salary, a fee adj udged and paid to him in a contempt proceeding under the prohibitory law ?

Section 6 of chapter 488 of the Laws of 1905 (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 9007), like section 6 of chapter 181 of the Laws of 1891; fixed the salary at $2500. Section 16 of chapter 181 required all fees received by any of the salaried officers mentioned in the act to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nation v. TulleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. City of Wichita v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  3. Reilly v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Cashin v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Heinz v. LarimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API