Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Larimer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 5, 1925No. 26,517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This action is one in mandamus to compel the defendant, as clerk of the court of Topeka, to pay over to the plaintiff, the county attorney of Shawnee county, the sum of $50 as fees earned by him in the prosecution and conviction of Ed Switzer on two counts for violating the prohibitory liquor law. On April 21, 1925, Ed Switzer paid the fines and the costs,- including $50. as an attorney’s fee. The defendant refuses to pay .the $50 to the plaintiff and bases his refusal on the following provision contained in section 1 of chapter 7 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. KnappSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Atchison v. DawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2002
  2. KNEA v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API